Abstract
A comparative study of the protests and demonstrations in Kenya (2024) and Sudan (2019) reveals similarities driven by comparable economic grievances.
An intersectional analysis highlights the impact of colonialism, structural racism, and various forms of oppression on the unequal distribution of resources and power. Critical race theory and postcolonial theory explain how historical and structural factors have contributed to this inequality (Delgado & Stefancic, 2017, p. 20; Ashcroft et al., 2006, p. 139). Intersectionality theory helps understand how economic status, ethnicity, and gender affect marginalized communities (Crenshaw, 1989, p. 149). Scholars like Frantz Fanon, Edward Said, and Gayatri Spivak emphasize the need to challenge dominant narratives and give voice to marginalized groups (Fanon, 1963, p. 21; Said, 1978, p. 78; Spivak, 1988, p. 21). Global evidence suggests that public spending has a positive link with GDP growth and that public and private sector companies are equally efficient (Hall & Nguyen, 2018, p.101). To address economic discontent, both countries must tackle austerity and corruption by restructuring tax systems, investing in public services, strengthening anti-corruption-measures, and engaging with communities, especially civil society. A holistic approach that prioritizes underprivileged communities can lead to a more equitable and sustainable future for all citizens.
